Player:  Impaler Subject: how should computer users should be detected?
2009-10-25 11:29:30 |
| is ther a way that chesshere should deal with the ascending number of members using chess software in the CC and RTC section? Is it not about time that some sort of regular system is implemented, not only to detect but also to eradicate this scurge? do you have any opinion in this matter? Should chesshere take exemple on othet sites? | - |
|
109 happyjack | 2009-11-12 18:23:19 |
I\'m going to use \"corrie\" as my name.Might as well be honest.If i get booted I get booted, | - |
|
| 110 FrippezMonTchu | 2009-11-12 18:38:02 |
It was a no brainer for me too; Henri DeToi. He can boot me as well; no skin off my neck. | - |
|
| 111 FrippezMonTchu | 2009-11-12 19:32:07 |
In any event, I don\'t believe he will. He needs the players. It\'s a new site; therefore I presume he will grant us renegades an amnesty.  | - |
|
| 112 happyjack | 2009-11-12 21:23:34 |
| Guess we will find out soon enough.You look cool in your new jacket Henri! | - |
|
| 113 FrippezMonTchu | 2009-11-13 05:49:33 |
A Hab jacket; they won in the desert last night. That franchise should be in Winnipeg  | - |
|
| 114 happyjack | 2009-11-13 10:03:25 |
| We would sure like to have the Jets back in Winnipeg.There has been some talk and we have a new building.All we need now is someone with lots of money. | - |
|
| 115 FrippezMonTchu | 2009-11-13 15:28:07 |
| It will come, I am sure...when Bettman is gone and the sooner the better. At least the seats will be filled. | - |
|
| 116 happyjack | 2009-11-23 21:21:00 |
| Another engine user caught at the \"OTHER\" site where I play.He was 96% compatible with fritz over 40+ games.His defense was that unlike most players who study GM games to improve their chess,he studied computer games to improve his chess.Therefore he played like a computer!Pretty lame,he\'s gone. | - |
|
117 angelfish | 2009-11-25 12:01:17 |
| isn\'t studying computer games a myth? | - |
|
| 118 happyjack | 2009-11-25 14:55:19 |
| In his case it was.I think we lost Impaler.He either left or was forced out. | - |
|
119 Taichung | 2009-11-25 17:02:16 |
| Studying computer games is not a myth. You can definitely play against a computer and learn but it takes a lot of time.
For someone to say that he has played against a computer for so long that he plays like a computer has to be nuts or he thinks everyone is stupid or both.
If he played like a computer then he probably has an ELO of about 2600 or better and should be on the GM tournament circuit instead of playing on line. | - |
|
| 120 Taichung | 2009-11-25 17:29:58 |
| About catching computer cheats by # times matching Fritz. Yes, but with a little thought.
First we need to eliminate all the \"book\" lines. Then we have to throw out all the \"forced\" or very obvious moves. Now from what is left if an individual matches >90% he is a probable in my mind. So, you have to go back over a number of his/her games say 20 or so.
If he/she still is over 90% then that to me is definite.
A good player will match Fritz maybe 50-60% of the time or higher depending on his strength.
A so/so player less. | - |
|
| 121 happyjack | 2009-11-25 18:14:41 |
| yup,that\'s just about exactly the way it\'s done where I play. | - |
|
| 122 FrippezMonTchu | 2009-11-26 06:51:43 |
I know this is farfetched and probably a stupid suggestion; but it is said that an autistic can reproduce exactly almost an unlimited sequence of numbers and make the most complex calculations. Maybe he could do the same in a chess game Tell it to the judge | - |
|
123 BetterThenEver | 2009-11-26 08:48:00 |
| Has there ever been an amazing autistic chess player? | - |
|
| 124 happyjack | 2009-11-26 09:42:09 |
| Sure has, Czech GM David Navara is autistic and
I believe GM Vassily Ivanchuk is as well.There are probably more. | - |
|
| 125 angelfish | 2009-11-26 11:49:07 |
| it wouldn\'t be surprising if there were amazing autistic chessplayers about ... there are plenty of autistic people, so why wouldn\'t there be amazing autistic chessplayers? | - |
|
| 126 angelfish | 2009-11-26 12:05:10 |
| but how do you study computer games??? | - |
|
| 127 happyjack | 2009-11-26 12:07:05 |
| Lol Henri.I hope you don\'t mean Judge Judy.I can\'t take more than 2 minutes of her telling people \"HEY! I\'M SPEAKING\",LOL | - |
|
| 128 happyjack | 2009-11-26 12:10:39 |
| I suppose you could buy a copy of Kasparov vs deep blue and study that. | - |
|
| 129 happyjack | 2009-11-26 12:11:36 |
I have,but I still don\'t play like a computer | - |
|
130 Ikke | 2009-11-26 16:52:19 |
| [QUOTE]Another engine user caught at the \\\"OTHER\\\" site where I play.He was 96% compatible with fritz over 40+ games.His defense was that unlike most players who study GM games to improve their chess,he studied computer games to improve his chess.Therefore he played like a computer!Pretty lame,he\\\'s gone.[END QUOTE]
what \"OTHER\" site are you referring to? i feel line beeing in an episode of LOST! The \"others\" | - |
|
| 131 FrippezMonTchu | 2009-11-26 18:39:34 |
I just can\'t stand Judge Judy either. She is rude, insolent, discourteous, impolite and disrespectful of the people who appear before her. Hopefully she is not representative of how real judges treat people. To get respect, you have to convey respect. It’s easy to act smart you are in a position of power holding the big end of the stick. What a dim-witted show | - |
|
| 132 angelfish | 2009-11-27 08:45:10 |
| punch will sort her out | - |
|
| 133 happyjack | 2009-11-27 09:32:12 |
| Sometimes I wish that I could be on her show just so I can tell her where to shove her gavel. | - |
|
| 134 angelfish | 2009-11-27 10:26:06 |
| you fancy her, don\'t you? | - |
|
| 135 Ikke | 2009-11-28 07:15:30 |
| thank you its a pretty cool site! now i know what happyjack is talking about | - |
|
| 136 Taichung | 2009-11-28 09:05:18 |
| What is the site? | - |
|
| 137 Taichung | 2009-11-30 19:54:34 |
| I was PMd about the site, thanks!! | - |
|
| 138 happyjack | 2009-11-30 22:02:16 |
| your welcome | - |
|
|
