| Online Chess | Login | Sign up and play online chess for Free | Help & FAQ | Contact Us | MEMBERSHIP | Invite Friends |
If you wish to play Real Time Chess, Correspondence Chess or to observe in Real Time Chess Games and become an active blog user, sign up with Chesshere.com
For Free registration Click here
Activate blog | Open New Blog
(Thanks for posting! before publishing, your post will be moderated) back to homepageChess alone is meaningless
I've beaten many others smarter than myself, at chess. I have a rival whom I cannot beat at chess, but can beat at other games, such as Go or Backgammon. From this I learned, chess isn't an expression of anything, it's a game we use to express ourselves. One of many games.
If both players play at their best, the better player will win. The way to change this pattern is to get better. I play chess because it's fun, but also because I have someone I want to beat. Chess alone is meaningless. It takes two to play a game.
I personally don't care for anonymous internet chess. If the match isn't personal, I can't get a thrill out of it. But once in a while, I find a player that's my level. Not too strong. Not too weak. A game that will remain even until somebody finds their hidden strength and activates the golden move.
Comments: 5Pages: [1]
|
|
- > Chess Players Talking
- > More Features
| Available | |
| Unavailable |

